Full reference : Frison-Roche, M.-A., Devoir de vigilance des entreprises : vers un Droit de la responsabilité ex ante ? (Duty of vigilance for companies: towards an ex ante liability law?), conference-debate, The Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway, 9th of February 2021. The conference-debate is moderated by Catherine Banet, Associate Professor, Scandinavian Insitute of Maritime Law, Department of Energy and Resources Law, University of Oslo
Translated SummariesIn The Journal of Regulation the summaries’ translation are done by the Editors and not by the authorsENGLISHThe debate on Net Neutrality faces a major difficulty, namely that of its legal status: does there exist a “legal principle”—meaning a rule somewhere within the entire body of law—with mandatory force that could be used to counter infrastructure operators’ discriminatory practices? FRENCHLe débat sur laneutralité du Netfait face à unedifficulté majeure, à savoir son statut juridique:existe-t-il un«principe juridique», qui exprime une règle dansl’ensemble du système juridique – avec une forceobligatoire quipourrait être utiliséepour contrerles pratiques discriminatoires des opérateurs d’ infrastructure ?SPANISHEl debate sobre la Neutralidad de la Red se enfrenta a una gran dificultad, primordialmente en cuanto a su estatus legal: ¿realmente existe un “principio legal” – es decir, una regla que se encuentra dentro de la disciplina del derecho – con fuerza mandataria que podría ser usado para enfrentar a las prácticas discriminatorios que practican los operadores de infraestructura? ITALIANIl dibattito sulla neutralità della rete si trova di fronte ad una difficoltà rilevante dal punto di vista del suo fondamento giuridico: esiste una norma giuridica obbligatoria – intesa come una norma legale – che possa essere utilizzata contro le pratiche discriminatorie degli operatori? ……………….. Other translations forthcoming.
Read more
Competitive neutralityEuropean directivesCourt of Justice of the European UnionNetworkGuidelineRight to accessSpeedPolitical questionA SUPPRIMER : European court of justice (doublon)Electronic communicationEuropean communication directive packageHADOPITechnological neutralityRegulatory principleFrameworkFederal communication commission (FCC)International LawNorwayaccessCopyrightTransparencyDiscriminationContentLessing, LawrencePear to pearPublic orderScreamingDeclaration of the Rights of Man and of the CitizenInternet service providerData transmissionFreedom of communicationGeneral legal principleLiberian philosophyinterconnectionPolicy statementTermination tariffVertically integrated operatorThe NetherlandsChiliFirst amendment of the american constitutionTraffic managementSoft lawItalyNet NeutralityEuropeInternetPowerUnited StatesCompetition authorityPhilosophyIndependent Administrative AuthorityEqualityEuropean CommissionFreedom of expressionInfrastructureDemocracyCompetition law
