opposants

Couverture – Compliance et droits de la défense

Articles in a JoRC book

📝Quand se justifie et quand s’arrête la collaboration ? À propos de la CJIP, in 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche et 🕴️M. Boissavy (dir.), 📕Compliance et droits de la défense. Enquête interne – CJIP – CRPC

► Full reference : P. Goossens, « Quand se justifie et quand s’arrête la collaboration ? À propos de la CJIP » (When Is Cooperation Justified and When Does It End? On the CJIP), in M.-A. Frison-Roche and M. Boissavy (eds.), Compliance et droits de la défense. Enquête interne – CJIP – CRPC, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz, coll. “Régulations & Compliance“, 2024, pp. 309-315. - ► English Summary of this article (made by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance – JoRC) : The author explains that, in the classical legal system, the lawyer engages in a “defence by opposition”. The so-called “Sapin 2” law adds to it a “defence by cooperation”, which fits more or less well with the former. The article lists both the advantages and the drawbacks of the logic of cooperation that the lawyer must take on. With pragmatism, the lawyer must handle both, in particular so that the rights of the defence of the company and its interests find their place in the CJIP mechanism.

Articles

Guerre larvée autour de la GPA