Anonymisation

LINDEN, Alexandre🕴️

📝Motivation and publicity of the decisions of the Restricted formation of the French Data Protection Authority (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés – CNIL) in a compliance perspective, in 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📘Compliance Jurisdictionalisation

► Full Reference : A. Linden, "Motivation and publicity of the decisions of the Restricted formation of the French Data Protection Authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés – CNIL) in a compliance perspective", in [rubrique p="Présentation"]M.-A. Frison-Roche[/rubrique] (ed.), [lien a="compliance-juridictionnalisation"]Compliance Jurisdictionalisation[/lien], Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant, coll. "[rubrique p="Responsabilités éditoriales > Direction de la collection Compliance & Regulation, JoRC et Bruylant"]Compliance & Regulation[/rubrique]", 2024, pp. 257-262.  - 📘read a general presentation of the book, [lien a="compliance-juridictionnalisation"]Complinace Jurisdictionalisation[/lien], in which this article is published - ► Summary of the article (done by the Journal of Regulation and Compliance): In the event of a breach of the personal data protection rules, the restricted formation of the French personal data protection Commission (CNIL) pronounces fines, injunctions of "compliance" or calls to order. It can order the publication of these measures, which can be contested before the French High Administrative supreme court (Conseil d'État). It is essential that these decisions be justified, not only in order to respect this principle of law but also concretely to obtain the public concerned, being very heterogeneous, understand them, the educational role of the CNIL also being applicable. The principle of publicity is handled with nuance, the data controllers often requesting a closed door and, in fact, very few public attending the hearing. The publicity of decisions is in itself a sanction. The publication may moreover not be total or may only have a time, anonymization often allowing the balance between necessary pedagogy and preservation of interests, the CNIL taking great attention to the very modalities of publication, even if it cannot control the circulation and the media use which is then made of it. - 🦉This article is available in full text to those registered for Professor Marie-Anne Frison-Roche's courses -

LINDEN, Alexandre🕴️

📝Motivation et publicité des décisions de la formation restreinte de la Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL) dans une perspective de compliance, in 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance

► Full Reference: A. Linden, "Motivation et publicité des décisions de la formation restreinte de la Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL) dans une perspective de compliance" ("Motivation and publicity of the decisions of the restricted committee of the French Personal Data Protection Commission (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés-CNIL) in a compliance perspective"), in [rubrique p="Présentation"]M.-A. Frison-Roche[/rubrique] (ed.), La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, coll. "[rubrique p='Responsabilités éditoriales > Direction de la collection "Régulations & Compliance", JoRC & Dalloz']Régulations & Compliance[/rubrique]", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz, 2023, pp. 235-239.  - 📕read a general presentation of the book, [lien a="la-juridictionnalisation-de-la-compliance"]La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance[/lien], in which this article is published - ► Summary of the article (done by the Journal of Regulation and Compliance): In the event of a breach of the personal data protection rules, the restricted formation of the French personal data protection Commission (CNIL) pronounces fines, injunctions of "compliance" or calls to order. It can order the publication of these measures, which can be contested before the French High Administrative supreme court (Conseil d'État). It is essential that these decisions be justified, not only in order to respect this principle of law but also concretely to obtain the public concerned, being very heterogeneous, understand them, the educational role of the CNIL also being applicable. The principle of publicity is handled with nuance, the data controllers often requesting a closed door and, in fact, very few public attending the hearing. The publicity of decisions is in itself a sanction. The publication may moreover not be total or may only have a time, anonymization often allowing the balance between necessary pedagogy and preservation of interests, the CNIL taking great attention to the very modalities of publication, even if it cannot control the circulation and the media use which is then made of it. -