05. CJCE – CJUE

► Full Reference: ECJ, First chamber, 7 December 2023, case C‑634/21, Schufa Holding AG - 🏛️read the judgement -   -

► Full Reference: CJUE, 1st Chamber, 22 June 2023, C-579/21, Pankki S. - 🏛️read the judgment -

Référence complète : Ordonnance de la vice-présidente de la Cour, République tchèque/Pologne,  C-121/21 R..

Full reference: CJEU, Grand chamber, Judgment Facebook Ireland e.a. v. Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit, C-645-19, June 15, 2021 Read the judgment Read the abstract of the judgment done by the Court Read the press release    

Full reference: CJEU, 2nd of February 2021, DB v. Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob), case C‑481/19 Read the decision Read the opinion of advocate general   Summary of the decision by CJEU:  "Natural persons who are subject to an administrative investigation for insider dealing have the right to remain silent when their answers might establish their liability for an offence that is punishable by administrative sanctions of a criminal nature, or their criminal liability".    To go further, read: Frison-Roche, M.-A., Resolve the contradiction between "incentive" and "sanction" under the fire of Compliance Law, 2021 Frison-Roche, M.-A., Rights, primary and natural Compliance tools, 2021

Full reference: CJEU, 1st chamber, 18th of November 2020, decision C‑519/19, Ryanair DAC vs DelayFix Read the decision   Summary of the decision This decision of the CJEU of 18th of November 2020 is about the jurisdiction clause for any dispute in air transport contracts, here those of Ryanair. This decision is especially interesting about the question to know whether the professional assignee (collection company) of a debt whose holder was a consumer may or may not avail itself of the consumer protection provisions, canceling the scope of this type of clause.  The Court takes back the criteria and the solution already used in 2019 about a credit contract: the protection applies by the criterion of the parties to the contract and not of the parties to the disputes. Such a clause is effective only if the integrality of the contract is transferred to the professional, and not only some of the stipulations. This Regulatory decision, through "private enforcement", incentivizes consumers to transfer their compensation claim (around 250 euros) to collection companies which, in turn, discipline airlines to stay on schedule.

Full reference: CJEU, Grand Chamber, 6th of October 2020, Privacy International c/ Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, C-623/17. Read the judgment  Read the summary of the judgment (in French) Read the opinion of the Advocate General  Read the reference for a preliminary ruling from the Investigatory Powers Tribunal – London (United Kingdom)

Full reference : CJEU, Vivendi S.A. / Autorita per la garanzie nelle Communicazioni, C-719/18, 3 décembre 2020.   Read the decision   Read the Court's press release presenting the judgment   Read the Court's press release presenting the Advocate General's conclusions   Read the Advocate General's conclusions

Full reference: CJEU, Grand Chamber, Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, C-362/14, October 6, 2015   Read the judgment Read the opinion of the Advocate General Read the press release    

Full reference: CJEU, Grand Chamber, Gauweiler v. Deutscher Bundestag, C-62/14 Read the judgment

Full reference: CJEU, Grand Chamber, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. c/ Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), C-131/12, May 13, 2014   Read the judgment

Full reference: CJCE, 4th of June 2002, Decision C-483/99, Commission v/ France (Total) Read the decision

Full reference: CJUE, 6th chamber, 23rd of April 1991, judgment C-41/90, Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser versus Macotron GmbH Read the decision

Read the Judgment.