Dec. 1, 2014


📕Généralités sur le principe du contradictoire. Étude de droit processuel (Generalities about the principle of contradictory. Study of procedural Law)

by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche

Pour lire cette présentation en français, cliquez sur le drapeau français

Full reference: Frison-Roche, M.A., GĂ©nĂ©ralitĂ©s sur le principe du contradictoire. Étude de droit processuel, coll. "Anthologie du Droit", LGDJ - Lextenso Ă©ditions, 2014, 221 p.


Republished from GĂ©nĂ©ralitĂ©s sur le principe du contradictoire Â», Étude de droit processuel, Th. Paris II, 1988. 

This book is the publication of a thèse d'Etat (French official thesis) written under the direction of Jean Foyer and defended in the PanthĂ©on-Assas University (Paris II) face to a jury made up among others of François TerrĂ©, RenĂ© Chapus, GĂ©rard Cornu, Geneviève Viney. 

The main idea is to defend that the principle of contradictory is a simple and fundamental principle, without which there is no Law. It is the reason it is obvious to study it as in civil procedure as in criminal, administrative or arbitrary procedures, to take back a "Procedural Law" perspective conceived by Motulsky. Indeed, without a judge listening without having already decided the facts and Law versions that presents who's the situation will be affected by the decision that the judge will make, there is no rule of Law. 

The main beneficiary of the principle of contradictory, it is not really the person, and it is in this that the contradictory is detached from the rights of the defense, it is the judge. Indeed, emphasizing contradictory versions of Law and facts which collide in front of him or her, the judge perceives more exactly and more fairly the world and the use of Law that he or she should favor. Thus, Law is better used. In this, we can consider that the principle of contradictory is consubstantial to Law.

Read the summary (in French)

Read the introduction (in French)

Read the table of contents (in French)

comments are disabled for this article